Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross
Those are some of the advantages to take when obtaining this Lessons In Censorship: How Schools And Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, By Catherine J. Ross by on the internet. But, just how is the means to obtain the soft documents? It's quite right for you to visit this web page considering that you could obtain the link web page to download and install guide Lessons In Censorship: How Schools And Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, By Catherine J. Ross Just click the link offered in this short article and goes downloading. It will not take much time to obtain this book Lessons In Censorship: How Schools And Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, By Catherine J. Ross, like when you have to go for book store.
Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross
Download Ebook Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross
American public schools often censor controversial student speech that the Constitution protects. Lessons in Censorship brings clarity to a bewildering array of court rulings that define the speech rights of young citizens in the school setting. Catherine J. Ross examines disputes that have erupted in our schools and courts over the civil rights movement, war and peace, rights for LGBTs, abortion, immigration, evangelical proselytizing, and the Confederate flag. She argues that the failure of schools to respect civil liberties betrays their educational mission and threatens democracy.
From the 1940s through the Warren years, the Supreme Court celebrated free expression and emphasized the role of schools in cultivating liberty. But the Burger, Rehnquist, and Roberts courts retreated from that vision, curtailing certain categories of student speech in the name of order and authority. Drawing on hundreds of lower court decisions, Ross shows how some judges either misunderstand the law or decline to rein in censorship that is clearly unconstitutional, and she powerfully demonstrates the continuing vitality of the Supreme Court’s initial affirmation of students’ expressive rights. Placing these battles in their social and historical context, Ross introduces us to the young protesters, journalists, and artists at the center of these stories.
Lessons in Censorship highlights the troubling and growing tendency of schools to clamp down on off-campus speech such as texting and sexting and reveals how well-intentioned measures to counter verbal bullying and hate speech may impinge on free speech. Throughout, Ross proposes ways to protect free expression without disrupting education.
Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross- Amazon Sales Rank: #419470 in Books
- Published on: 2015-10-19
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.20" h x 1.20" w x 6.30" l, .0 pounds
- Binding: Hardcover
- 368 pages
Review Ross…makes a compelling case in Lessons in Censorship for the importance of according students free speech not only as a constitutional right, but also as a vital democratic practice. (Joan Wallach Scott The Nation 2016-02-11)It is a revealing book about judicially sanctioned censorship… Well-argued and well-researched… Turn the pages of Lessons in Censorship and you will discover what it means for students to think freely and how courts have fashioned baseless arguments designed to squelch such thinking… Lessons in Censorship is a book that should be read and discussed by school officials at all levels of education. It is a work that should be pored over by school board officials and lawyers who represent school districts and college campuses. And its message should carry over into the memoranda and briefs that lawyers file to inform judges. (Ronald K. L. Collins Concurring Opinions 2015-12-07)We teach our children to celebrate freedom of speech but what freedom do they have when their schools too often punish them for exercising it? Catherine Ross’s powerful and lucid exposé of the increasingly routine censorship of student speech is well worth our attention and concern. (Floyd Abrams, Cahill Gordon & Reindel, LLP)A magnificent book. Catherine Ross has given us a beautifully written and original contribution to our understanding of the nexus of constitutional law, lower courts, and everyday life in our public schools. She persuasively demonstrates that schools and judges too often teach ‘lessons in censorship’ that threaten the First Amendment and our vital culture of democracy. (Erwin Chemerinsky, University of California, Irvine School of Law)Every student, parent, teacher, and principal should read―and heed―the lessons about the First Amendment rights of students in this terrific and timely book. (Glenn Altschuler, Cornell University)An extraordinary book. Ross offers the best account I have read about why we have free speech and why we value it so much―insightful and accessible. Beyond explaining what students can say, and how they can say it, and how limits have developed over the last ninety years, Lessons in Censorship powerfully argues that speech rights in public school are essential to the health of democratic governance―every concerned citizen must read this book. (Gene Policinski, author of the weekly column Inside the First Amendment)
About the Author Catherine J. Ross is Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School.
Where to Download Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross
Most helpful customer reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. The Authoritative Text on Constitutionally Protected Speech in America’s Public Schools By W. Cecil Jones This is one fine book – intelligently organized and lucidly written, an essential text for any practitioner, legal scholar or lay reader who wants a broad yet scrupulously documented overview of constitutional precedents governing the First Amendment rights of public school students in America.Lessons in Censorship totals 299 pages, not including copious footnotes and a detailed index. Its eight chapters are divided into three main sections.In the first section, Ross examines a “legal quintet” of Supreme Court decisions that have set out - and have progressively blurred, she says – constitutional guidelines governing pre-college student speech. She begins with Justice Jackson’s seminal decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), where the court held unconstitutional the school’s requirement that Jehovah’s Witness students recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Significantly, Ross notes, the court grounded its decision in the Speech Clause rather than Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.The next milestone is Tinker v. Des Moines Public School District, handed down in 1969 at a time of growing student protest against the Vietnam War. Tinker built on Barnette’s free speech principles to expand dramatically the scope of constitutionally protected student speech in public schools. Writing for an 8-1 majority, Justice Fortas laid out what became known as the Tinker test for student speech: that is, expression must be permitted unless it (a) materially and substantially interferes with school discipline or the educational process, or (b) diminishes the rights of other students who simply want to be left alone.Ross then demonstrates how three major cases from increasingly conservative Supreme Courts have dimmed the promise of Tinker. These decisions – Bethel School District vs. Fraser (1986), Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) and Frederick v. Morse (2007) - also dissipated Tinker’s bright-line test for student speech. As a result, Ross says, Supreme Court jurisprudence governing student speech is muddled and offers little guidance to school principals who have to make snap decisions about protected speech.Ross explains that Fraser, which concerned what the school viewed as “lewd speech,” left intact Tinker’s protection of speech content, but affirmed administrators’ authority to promote civility and respect by restricting the manner (e.g., sexually suggestive words) in which ideas were expressed. Hazelwood announced a new category of expression – “school-sponsored speech” – and gave authorities wide latitude to curb speech that could be perceived as having the school’s stamp of approval.The first section ends with Ross’ analysis of Morse, popularly known as the “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” case. This moniker reflects the message on a banner held by high school senior Joseph Frederick at a quasi-school-sponsored event in Anchorage. It is in Morse that Ross’ analytical skills are most fully on display. With surgical precision she picks apart the opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, which, in further diminishing Tinker, essentially set up a new category of expression that administrators could censor and punish – speech that appears to promote illegal drug use. She examines in detail Justice Alito’s seemingly reluctant concurrence, where he points out that had Frederick’s banner contained “political” speech, the message most likely would have been protected speech under Tinker principles. In sum, Ross says that Morse’s “murky framing” further confused the law governing student speech, “leaving lower courts to fill in the blanks.”Having laid out what she dubs “the taxonomy of school censorship” law, with all its legal nooks and crannies, Ross devotes her middle chapters to showing how school administrators, buoyed in particular by Fraser and Hazelwood, have applied (and misapplied) this taxonomy to actual student speech situations. Generally, she points out, administrators have viewed post-Tinker cases as license to curb student speech.To her great credit, Ross does not take an extremist Tinker-or-nothing view of student speech, nor does she gloss over questions raised by the legitimately competing interests of students and school administrators. She squarely confronts the problems of bullying and offensive speech. She acknowledges – and proposes solutions for - the Gordian knot posed when administrators’ commendable desire to discourage speech harmful to others clashes with the equally commendable goal of encouraging students to exercise their First Amendment rights, even when their speech may cause offense.In her closing chapters Ross returns to Tinker, which she calls “the lodestar for protecting young people’s rights to express both their most profound beliefs and their less exalted thoughts.” She makes the case that while post-Tinker decisions have “diminished its reach,” they have “never extinguished its spark.”Lessons in Censorship is remarkable for the quality and clarify of its writing, and for its multi-dimensional approach to case analysis. Each case is reviewed in its historical context, with Ross demonstrating how presidential politics shaped judicial appointments, and how in turn newly appointed conservative justices shaped post-Tinker decisions that effectively transferred the balance of power from students back to administrators. She shows how in actual practice the blurring of Tinker’s simple two-part test has left the two major players here - students and administrators - unsure of the boundaries of constitutionally protected speech. An unfortunate by-product of the ensuing confusion, Ross notes, is that administrators have been emboldened to take the easy way out by imposing increasingly strict limits on student expression.Ross’ book is animated by her strong belief that a pre-college environment of robust debate launches children on the road to full participation in a democracy (in Barnette, Justice Jackson called it “educating the young for citizenship”). But she is mindful that principals, however dedicated they may be as educators to encouraging a vigorous marketplace of ideas, are restrained by parens patriae obligations, and must answer to a constituency of parents and local school board policy makers. While clearly dismayed by the drift toward restricted speech in post-Tinker decisions, she encourages administrators to take the high road in fostering a culture of free-wheeling school-sponsored speech. If there is fallout in the community, she suggests, the ensuing debate can be used as a constructive exercise to educate students and parents alike in how “indispensable [speech is] to the union we continually strive to perfect.”Lessons in Censorship is the absolute go-to text for practitioners in this area. But you don’t need a JD to enjoy and profit from this finely written book, as Ross has a gift for laying out complex ideas in an easily comprehensible fashion. It is laced with instructive legal anecdotes, and each chapter has a clear narrative arc that – at least for legal geeks - makes the book a real page-turner.Every school district would be wise to buy this book and make it required reading for principals of elementary through high schools. Ditto for district legal counsel charged with defending administrators who fail to heed the message of Lessons in Censorship, and thus find their clients embroiled in costly First Amendment litigation.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful. First rate and timely By Thomas Remington Incisively written, clearly and thoughtfully argued. A valuable guide to the current state of law and practice in this contentious area. Ross makes a systematic and persuasive argument that First Amendment rights must and can be defended in the country's public schools without sacrificing schools' responsibilities to teach and protect our children. Highly recommended.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. I have been waiting for an outstanding analysis like this one By David Wheeler A Minnesota school punishes a 12-year-old because she called a hall monitor “mean” on Facebook. A high school principal in Connecticut tells students they cannot perform a play — even off campus, for family and friends. A group of schools hires private contractors to surveil students’ use of social media.What’s going on with students’ First Amendment rights in this country? You can find the answer to that question — as well as solutions to the ever-worsening problems of school overreach — in Catherine J. Ross’ lively and engaging book, Lessons in Censorship. As a journalism professor, I have been waiting for an outstanding analysis like this one, which expertly places the history of student First Amendmentrights in context. Ross’ book accomplishes that goal and much more. I would recommend this incredibly important work to anyone who cares about free speech, journalism, and the preservation of the American educational system. As Ross writes, “…Whatever social cohesion we aspire to achieve has its best chance of taking hold in public schools.” Today’s young people hold the keys to our collective future, and if they learn the wrong lessons about democracy, we’re in serious danger.But Ross’ book also sounds a hopeful note, pointing to new, unexpected de facto alliances among disparate groups who share the goal of protecting free speech. Indeed, you can read Ross’ book and find the confidence to believe the words of the Supreme Court’s decision in the 1969 case Tinker vs. Des Moines: “It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”
See all 3 customer reviews... Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. RossLessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross PDF
Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross iBooks
Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross ePub
Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross rtf
Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross AZW
Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students' First Amendment Rights, by Catherine J. Ross Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar